Pathogenetic features of functional disorders in the remaining kidney during the early postoperative period of radical nephrectomy
https://doi.org/10.37489/2949-1924-0065
EDN: EXKAZQ
Abstract
Relevance. Despite the widespread introduction of organ-preserving operations into urological practice, the number of radical nephrectomies has continued to increase. The results of modern research show that the initial stages of diseases of the remaining kidney are already formed at the earliest possible time after radical nephrectomy; therefore, adequate management of the postoperative period is a key factor in the prevention of diseases of the single kidney. However, this approach should be based on a detailed understanding of the mechanisms of adaptive restructuring of the body, which have a key effect on the morphology and function of a single kidney.
Objective. To study the features of adaptive body reactions and the dynamics of the functional state of a single kidney following radical nephrectomy.
Materials and methods. In the early postoperative period, the clinical and laboratory parameters of 85 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in the T2-T3N0M0 stage were studied. The control group comprised 25 patients who underwent similar operations for the same indications within a period of 1.5–12 months. The metabolism of adrenaline, histamine, and serotonin, indicators of psychological and emotional states, vegetative-vascular status, and nitrogen excretion and filtration functions of the remaining kidney were studied.
Results. Radical nephrectomy, as well as the period of conscious expectation, is the cause of a stress syndrome that occurs due to an imbalance of the studied biogenic amines, accompanied by disorders of psychological and emotional health and vegetative-vascular disorders observed at least during the 2 weeks of the postoperative period. In addition, the filtration capacity of a single kidney is impaired, and it persists for 14 days at follow-up. Correlation analysis made it possible to establish reliable links between the imbalance of biogenic amine and anxiety levels and the severity of autonomic vascular disorders, which adversely affect kidney filtration.
Conclusions. The results of this study indicate the need for pharmacological subsidies during the postoperative period of radical nephrectomy, which makes it possible to offset the negative impact of stress syndrome on the outcome of surgical treatment.
About the Authors
I. S. ShormanovRussian Federation
Igor S. Shormanov — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Urology with Nephrology
Yaroslavl
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
M. V. Kosenko
Russian Federation
Maksim V. Kosenko — assistant of the department of urology with nephrology; deputy chief physician for medical work of the Nekrasovskaya Central Regional Hospital
Yaroslavl
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
D. N. Shchedrov
Russian Federation
Dmitry N. Shchedrov — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Urology with Nephrology; Head of the Department of Pediatric Uroandrology, Yaroslavl Regional Children's Clinical Hospital
Yaroslavl
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
S. A. Zhigalov
Russian Federation
Sergey A. Zhigalov — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of Urology with Nephrology
Yaroslavl
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
A. S. Solovyov
Russian Federation
Andrey S. Solovyov — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of Urology with Nephrology
Yaroslavl
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
H. A. Sokolova
Russian Federation
Hristina A. Sokolova — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of Urology with Nephrology
Yaroslavl
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Ivanov A.P., Fedorov V.N., Chernyshev I.V., Tyuzikov I.A. The disorder of kathecholamine metabolism after a kidney resection and nephrectomy in the experiment. Cancer Urology. 2011;7(3):31-35. https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2011-7-3-31-35 (In Russ.).
2. Andreev SS, Tityaev II, Neymark BA, Vasilenko AA. Early signs of single kidney dysfunction after nephrectomy for kidney cancer. Ural Medical Journal. 2022;21(4):13-18. ttps://doi.org/10.52420/2071-5943-2022-21-4-13-18 (In Russ.).
3. Axel E.M., Matveev V.В. Statistics of malignant tumors of urinary and male urogenital organs in Russia and the countries of the former USSR. Cancer Urology. 2019;15(2):15-24. https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2019-15-2-15-24 (In Russ.).
4. СSmirnov AV, Dobronravov VA, Bodur-Oorzhak ASh, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of chronic kidney diseases: regional level of a common problem. Therapeutic archive. 2005;6:20–27. (In Russ.).
5. Ivanov AP, Tyuzikov IA. Nephrectomy in modern conditions: reasons and further fate of patients with a single kidney. Fundamental research. 2011;7:64–66. (In Russ.).
6. Kochkin AD, Sevryukov FA, Sorokin DA, Karpushin IV, Puchkin AB, Semenychev DV. Combined laparoscopic surgeries: two in one. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2013;4:82– 84. (In Russ.).
7. Alyaev YuG, Krapivin AA. Localized and locally advanced kidney cancer: nephrectomy or resection? Oncourology. 2005;1(1):10-15. https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2005-1-1-10-15.
8. Kit OI, Aboyan IA, Osokin RA, Zhenilo VM, Komarova EF, Maksimov AY. Arterial hypertension and kidney cancer: some aspects of the problem. Ural Medical Journal. 2018;(3):42-46. https://doi.org/10.25694/URMJ.2018.03.029 (In Russ.).
9. Clinical guidelines of the Russian Federation 2023 (Russia). Renal parenchyma cancer..
10. ЗMalignant neoplasms in Russia in 2021 (incidence and mortality). Edited by A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinsky, A.O. Shakhzadova. Moscow, 2022. 252 p.
11. Matveev VB, Markova AS. Renal cell carcinoma: What’s new in 2018. Cancer Urology. 2018;14(4):48-52. https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2018-14-4-48-52 (In Russ.).
12. Alekseeva GN, Kiku PF, Yudin SV, Shcherbakova LS, Moreva VG. Comparative assessment of the quality of life of patients with kidney cancer after surgical treatment. Bulletin Physiology and Pathology of Respiration. 2017;(66):77-82. https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5a24b1918ee2a4.73477487 (In Russ.).
13. Frolova VE. Risk factors for chronic renal failure after nephrectomy in patients with unilateral kidney cancer. International Student Scientific Bulletin. 2017;5:27–28.
14. Tyuzikov IA, Martov AG. Systemic metabolic factors of pathogenesis of diseases of a single kidney in men (pilot study). Urology. 2012;3:11–14.
15. Ivanov AP, Tyuzikov IA, Fateev DM. The modern etiological structure of single kidney diseases after nephrectomy. Military medical journal. 2011;332(9):69-71. (In Russ.).
16. Voznesensky AB. On the issue of regeneration processes in a partially resected kidney: Dissertation. St. Petersburg, 1904. (In Russ.).
17. Shabad AL. On nephrectomy for tuberculosis and on diseases of the remaining kidney. Urology and Nephrology. 1971;1:21–25. (In Russ.).
18. Apolikhin OI, Yurgel NV, Bondarev SV, Bebeshko EV. Analysis of some aspects of providing renal replacement therapy and hemodialysis in Russia. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2010; 3:4–10. (In Russ.).
19. Tyuzikov I.A., Ivanov A.P., Kalinchenko S.Yu. Clinical and experimental substantiation of the pathogenesis of diseases of a single kidney as an interdisciplinary problem. Bulletin of the Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenology and Radiology (electronic journal). 2012;2:12. URL: http://vestnik.rncrr.ru/vestnik/v12/papers/tuzikov_v12.htm (In Russ.).
20. Shormanov IS, Los MS, Kosenko MV, Shormanova NS. Pathomorphology of adaptive changes in the remaining kidney in the early postoperative period after nephrectomy. Urology reports (St.-Petersburg). 2020;10(1):19-24. doi: 10.17816/uroved10119-24 (In Russ.).
21. Popov SV, Guseinov RG, Sivak KV, Perepelitsa VV, Bunenkov NS, Ulitina AS. Renal function, endotoxicosis, and oxidative stress in patients after open and laparoscopic nephrectomy. Urology reports (St.-Petersburg). 2023;13(1):71-78. doi: 10.17816/uroved119542
22. Kulchenko NG. Treatment of localized renal cancer. South Russian Journal of Cancer. 2020;1(1):69-75. https://doi.org/10.37748/2687-0533-2020-1-1-6 (In Russ.).
23. Shormanov IS, Los' MS, Chirkov AN. Profilaktika oslozhneniy total'noy «teplovoy ishemii» pri rezektsii pochki. Urology reports (St.-Petersburg). 2015;5(1): 34-35. doi: 10.17816/uroved5134-35
24. Popov SV, Skryabin ON, Suleimanov MM, Guseinov RG. Comparative analysis of the results of endovideosurgical nephron-preserving operations for kidney tumors performed under conditions of warm ischemia of the organ and with preservation of its blood supply. Postgraduate doctor. 2015;1(68):54-8. (In Russ.).
25. Kadyrov ZA, Odylov AYu. Complications of open, laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy in various kidney diseases. Urology. 2020;4:151–156. DOI: 10.18565/urology.2020.4.151–156
26. Proshina LYa. Studies of serotonin and histamine in one blood sample. Laboratory work. 1981;2:90-93.
27. Goryachkovsky A. Clinical biochemistry in laboratory diagnostics. –– Odessa: Ecology, 2005. –– 616 p..
28. Zung WW. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics. 1971;12:371–379.
29. Kérdö I. Ein aus Daten der Blutzirkulation kalkulierter Index zur Beurteilung der vegetativen Tonuslage. Acta Neurovegetativa. 1966;29(2):250.
30. Smirnov AV, Shilov EM, Dobronravov VA, Kayukov IG, Bobkova IN, Shvetsov MYu, Tsygin AN, Shutov AM. National guidelines. chronic kidney disease: basic principles of screening, diagnosis, prevention and treatment approaches. Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg). 2012;16(1):89-115. https://doi.org/10.24884/1561-6274-2012-16-1-89-115 (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Shormanov I.S., Kosenko M.V., Shchedrov D.N., Zhigalov S.A., Solovyov A.S., Sokolova H.A. Pathogenetic features of functional disorders in the remaining kidney during the early postoperative period of radical nephrectomy. Patient-Oriented Medicine and Pharmacy. 2024;2(4):30-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/2949-1924-0065. EDN: EXKAZQ